Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 7415

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : OC01 - OC04 Full Version

Cardiopulmonary Involvement in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/65990.18889
Akhila J Prasad, Jijith Krishnan, U Bijilesh

1. Senior Resident, Department of Medicine, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India. 2. Professor, Department of Medicine, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Jijith Krishnan,
Professor, Department of Medicine, Government Medical College, Thrissur-680596, Kerala, India.
E-mail: drjijith@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: One of the most challenging aspects of systemic sclerosis is the potential involvement of the cardiopulmonary system, which can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if not detected and managed promptly.

Aim: To assess the clinical characteristics and prevalence of specific cardiopulmonary involvement and to investigate its association with disease duration in patients with systemic sclerosis from South India.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at the Department of General Medicine, Government Medical College, Thrissur, India, between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. Forty patients with systemic sclerosis were included according to the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria. Skin thickening was evaluated using the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Investigations such as chest X-ray, echocardiogram, and antibody profiling were conducted to evaluate cardiopulmonary involvement. The data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0, and the Chi-square test was used to compare qualitative variables between groups.

Results: Sixteen patients (40%) had an mRSS score between 11 and 20, followed by 14 patients (35%) with mRSS scores between 21 and 30. The prevalence of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) was 50%. The echocardiogram findings showed mitral regurgitation and moderate Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) in 30% (n=12) and 25% (n=10) of patients, respectively. High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) and pulmonary function tests were normal in 10 patients (25%). The duration of the disease was three to eight years in 14 patients and eight to 12 years in 12 patients. Both ILD and PAH were significantly associated with the duration of the disease (p<0.05). Anti-scleroderma-70 and anti-centromere were the most common antibodies present in patients with ILD and PAH, respectively.

Conclusion: The study indicated a high prevalence of PAH and ILD in patients with systemic sclerosis. Moreover, both ILD and PAH were significantly associated with the duration of the underlying disease, with longer disease duration being associated with a higher likelihood of these conditions.

Keywords

Left ventricular hypertrophy, Lung disease, Pulmonary arterial hypertension, Scleroderma

Systemic sclerosis is a connective tissue disease clinically represented by hidebound skin and organ compromise (1),(2). It is characterised by vascular dysfunction, skin and visceral fibrosis, and is divided into two groups: limited and diffuse cutaneous disease (3),(4),(5). The limited form includes skin thickening distal to the elbows and knees, with less severe internal organ involvement. The diffuse form affects the skin proximal to the elbows and knees as well as the distal areas, where more severe organ damage is present (4).

Manifestations of systemic sclerosis can occur in various tissues and organs, with cardiac involvement being one of the leading causes of mortality (3). Cardiac manifestations may result in pericardial effusion, arrhythmias, conduction system defects, valvular regurgitation, myocardial ischaemia, myocardial hypertrophy, and heart failure (6),(7). Cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis can include direct (primary) myocardial effects such as myositis, cardiac failure, cardiac fibrosis, coronary artery disease, and pericardial disease, or indirect (secondary) effects of other organ involvement such as PAH, ILD, or kidney disease (8),(9).

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) is defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mmHg, as determined by Right Heart Catheterisation (RHC), and it affects about 8-12% of patients with systemic sclerosis (10),(11). Systemic sclerosis patients with PAH are associated with a >3-fold increased risk of death compared to those without PAH (11). Symptoms of indolent, progressive shortness of breath, pedal oedema, ascites, and congestive hepatomegaly are usually presented by patients with pulmonary hypertension and subsequent right heart failure (8). Symptoms of severe pulmonary hypertension may include syncope and sudden cardiac death, most likely caused by arrhythmias or acute right ventricular failure (8).

On the other hand, ILD in patients with systemic sclerosis is a relatively limited and slowly progressive condition in limited cutaneous form, whereas it has a rapidly progressive nature in diffuse systemic sclerosis (10). Although the primary pathway in the pathogenesis of ILD associated with systemic sclerosis has not been definitively identified, the progression of lung disease can be retarded by the early identification and assessment of ILD using High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) (12).

The early cardiac manifestations of systemic sclerosis are often non-specific, and patients may therefore remain undiagnosed, potentially enabling the silent progression of the disease (6). Detection of ILD and PAH at an early pre-symptomatic stage and individually tailored therapy can help manage the disease (4). While several studies are available demonstrating cardiopulmonary involvement in scleroderma patients (13),(14),(15),(16), only a few have discussed its association with disease duration (17),(18).

Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics and prevalence of specific cardiopulmonary involvement and to investigate their association with disease duration in patients with systemic sclerosis from South India.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in scleroderma patients at the Department of General Medicine, Government Medical College, Thrissur, India, between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. The study was based on the revised systemic sclerosis classification criteria by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) (19). The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, and the study procedures were in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki {Approval No. B6-155/2019/MCTCR (14)}. Written informed consent was obtained from all study patients before enrolment.

Inclusion criteria: The study included patients with systemic sclerosis, of either gender, attending the Medicine and Rheumatology Clinic.

Exclusion criteria: Those patients with features of mixed and undifferentiated connective tissue disorder, overlap syndrome, a previous history of pulmonary tuberculosis, occupational lung disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and those unwilling to provide consent were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Based on observations from the previous year, where approximately 40 scleroderma patients attended the Rheumatology clinic and Medicine department, this study aimed to investigate scleroderma patients in greater detail. The population size was arbitrarily fixed at 40 based on clinical observation.

Procedure

All patients satisfying the inclusion criteria attending the OPD and IP of the Rheumatology clinic and Medicine department during the defined time period of the study were included.

Skin thickening was evaluated using the mRSS (20). The skin thickening was assessed by palpation of the skin in 17 areas of the body (fingers, hands, forearms, upper arms, face, anterior chest, abdomen, thigh, leg, and feet). The score is given as follows:

• 0- no thickening,
• 1- mild thickening,
• 2- moderate thickening,
• 3- severe thickening.

Trained healthcare professionals performed clinical examinations, echocardiography, chest X-rays, and High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) scans. Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs) were conducted by certified respiratory therapists. Investigations such as chest X-ray, Echocardiogram (ECHO) and antibody profiles were also collected and analysed.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed using the SPSS software version 23.0. Qualitative data were presented as numbers and percentages. A comparison of qualitative variables between the groups was performed using the Chi-square test. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Results

A total of 40 patients were enrolled in the study, all of whom were female. The mean age of the study population was 45.1 (SD 8.2) years. (Table/Fig 1) depicts the clinical and imaging findings of the patients.

The mRSS scores were 0-10 in 25% of patients, 11-20 in 40% of patients, and 21-30 in 35% of patients. Echocardiography (ECHO) findings were normal in half of the study population (52.5%), while mitral regurgitation and moderate PAH were observed in 30% (n=12) and 25% (n=10) of patients, respectively. Chest X-ray findings were normal in 17 (42.5%) patients, while reticular opacity, bronchiectatic shadows, and fibrosis were found in 16 (40%), 10 (25%), and 5 (12.5%) patients, respectively. HRCT and PFT findings were normal in 10 patients (25%) each. Anti-centromere antibody was most commonly found in 23 (57.5%) patients (Table/Fig 1).

The association of disease duration with ILD and PAH is given in (Table/Fig 2). The prevalence of ILD and PAH was 50% (n=20) and 35% (n=14), respectively. The majority of patients (n=14; 35%) had a disease duration of >2 to ≤8 years.

The prevalence of ILD and PAH tends to increase with the duration of the disease. Both ILD and PAH were significantly associated with the disease duration (p<0.05) (Table/Fig 2).

However, there was no association between mRSS and the disease duration, as well as the presence of ILD and PAH (p>0.05) (Table/Fig 3). Anti-scleroderma-70 antibody was the most common antibody present in patients with ILD, while anti-centromere antibody was more prevalent in patients with PAH (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

ILD is a common manifestation in systemic sclerosis, and research indicates its occurrence in a substantial proportion of patients (21),(22),(23). PAH is another critical complication, particularly in advanced stages of systemic sclerosis (24),(25),(26). Understanding the prevalence of these complications is crucial for timely diagnosis and management. The present study aimed to determine predictors of cardiopulmonary involvement in systemic sclerosis. In this study, chest X-ray findings were normal in 17 (42.5%) patients, while reticular opacity, bronchiectatic shadows, and fibrosis were found in 16 (40%), 10 (25%), and 5 (12.5%) patients, respectively. These findings align with previous studies. Arakkal G et al., conducted a study on cardiopulmonary involvement in systemic sclerosis, where abnormal chest X-ray findings were observed in 16 (57.1%) patients (4). Sharma VK et al., also reported abnormal X-rays in 65.3% of the study population (27). These findings suggest that chest X-ray abnormalities are relatively common among systemic sclerosis patients and can serve as important indicators of cardiopulmonary involvement in this population. Therefore, these results provide valuable insights into the presence of abnormal chest X-ray findings in individuals with systemic sclerosis, enhancing our understanding of the disease’s impact on the pulmonary system.

In the present study, PFT was normal in 25% of patients, which is significantly lower compared to the previous study by Sharma VK et al., where 85.8% of patients had abnormal PFT results (27). Steen VD et al., noted a restrictive disease in 40% (359/890) of patients, with 27% having a moderate restrictive pattern and 13% having a severe restrictive pattern (28). However, in this study, the prevalence of restrictive pattern was comparatively higher, observed in 75% of patients, with 14% and 5% of patients having moderate and severe restriction, respectively. These findings suggest variability in PFT results among systemic sclerosis patients, highlighting the heterogeneity of the disease. The differences between the current study and previous research conducted by Sharma VK et al., and Steen VD et al., may be attributed to factors such as patient demographics, disease severity, or even the methodology used in PFT assessments (27),(28).

Arakkal G et al., reported HRCT features suggestive of ILD in 21 (75%) patients, with ground glass opacities in 14 (66.7%), honeycombing in 12 (57.1%), reticulations in 9 (42.9%), architectural distortion in 10 (47.6%), septal thickening in 10 (47.6%), and tractional bronchiectasis in five (23.8%) patients (4). In this study, HRCT findings showed septal thickening, ground glass and reticular opacities in five patients each, honeycombing in 10 (25%) patients, and fibrosis and traction bronchiectasis in nine patients. These findings indicate the presence of common radiological characteristics associated with ILD in systemic sclerosis patients. The consistency in HRCT findings underscores the significance of these patterns as potential indicators of ILD in this patient population. It emphasises the importance of early detection and management of pulmonary involvement in systemic sclerosis.

Anti-topoisomerase I auto-antibodies, also known as anti-scleroderma-70 antibodies, are found in approximately 20% of systemic sclerosis patients, most commonly in association with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Systemic sclerosis-ILD is most prevalent in patients positive for anti-topoisomerase I auto-antibodies (12). In this study, approximately 42.5% of patients with anti-scleroderma-70 antibodies exhibited the presence of ILD. On the other hand, anti-centromere antibodies, present in about 20-30% of systemic sclerosis patients, are associated with a low prevalence of systemic sclerosis-ILD. Anti-centromere antibody positivity is associated with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and an increased risk of PAH (12). In the present study, 32.5% of patients with anti-centromere antibodies had PAH. These findings highlight the importance of auto-antibody profiling in systemic sclerosis patients as it can help predict and manage specific clinical manifestations. The detection of anti-scleroderma-70 antibodies may alert clinicians to the potential presence of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)-ILD, while the presence of anti-centromere antibodies may indicate an increased risk of PAH.

In the present study, the prevalence of ILD and PAH tends to increase with the duration of the disease. Importantly, patients with a longer history of the underlying condition showed a higher likelihood of having ILD and PAH. These findings are consistent with previous research conducted on patients with systemic sclerosis (17),(18). This consistency with prior studies underscores the robustness of the observed association between disease duration and the occurrence of ILD and PAH. It suggests that the relationship between disease duration and these pulmonary complications is a recurring pattern in individuals with systemic sclerosis. Understanding this association is vital for healthcare practitioners as it aids in risk assessment, early detection, and the development of tailored treatment strategies for patients with varying disease durations.

Limitation(s)

Firstly, the sample size of the study may not encompass the full spectrum of systemic sclerosis patients, and there may be variations in disease presentation and severity in a larger and more diverse population. Secondly, the retrospective nature of some data collection, such as disease duration, relies on patient self-reporting and medical records, which may introduce recall bias or incomplete information. Finally, this study primarily focuses on the association between cardiopulmonary involvement and disease duration, and other factors that could influence these outcomes, such as treatment regimens or co-morbidities, were not comprehensively analysed.

Conclusion

This study highlights the higher prevalence of ILD and PAH in patients with systemic sclerosis. Furthermore, both ILD and PAH showed significant associations with the duration of the underlying disease, where longer disease duration was associated with a higher likelihood of these conditions. These findings can guide clinicians in devising individualised treatment strategies for systemic sclerosis patients based on their disease duration and specific cardiopulmonary manifestations, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life. However, further research in this area is needed to enhance our understanding and address any remaining questions.

References

1.
LeRoy EC, Black C, Fleischmajer R, Jablonska S, Krieg T, Medsger TA Jr, et al. Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): Classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(2):202-05.
2.
Odonwodo A, Badri T, Hariz A. Scleroderma. [Updated 2023 Jul 31]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537335/.
3.
Meune C, Vignaux O, Kahan A, Allanore Y. Heart involvement in systemic sclerosis: Evolving concept and diagnostic methodologies. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;103(1):46-52. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Arakkal G, Chintagunta SR, Chandika V, Damarla SV, Manchala S, Kumar BU. Cardio-pulmonary involvement in systemic sclerosis: A study at a tertiary care center. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2017;83(6):677-82. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Fioretto BS, Rosa I, Matucci-Cerinic M, Romano E, Manetti M. Current trends in vascular biomarkers for systemic sclerosis: A narrative review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(4):4097. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Kahan A, Coghlan G, McLaughlin V. Cardiac complications of systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48(Suppl 3):iii45-iii48. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Lambova S. Cardiac manifestations in systemic sclerosis. World J Cardiol. 2014;6(9):993-1005. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Champion HC. The heart in scleroderma. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2008;34(1):181-90. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Desai CS, Lee DC, Shah SJ. Systemic sclerosis and the heart: Current diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23(6):545-54. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Farge D, Burt RK, Oliveira MC, Mousseaux E, Rovira M, Marjanovic Z, et al. Cardiopulmonary assessment of patients with systemic sclerosis for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Recommendations from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Autoimmune Diseases Working Party and collaborating partners. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52(11):1495-503. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Chung L, Domsic RT, Lingala B, Alkassab F, Bolster M, Csuka ME, et al. Survival and predictors of mortality in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: Outcomes from the pulmonary hypertension assessment and recognition of outcomes in scleroderma registry. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(3):489-95. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Wells AU. Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis. Presse Med. 2014;43(10 Pt 2):e329-43. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Kuwana M, Saito A, Sakamoto W, Raabe C, Saito K. Incidence rate and prevalence of systemic sclerosis and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease in Japan: Analysis using Japanese claims databases. Adv Ther. 2022;39(5):2222-35. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kumar U, Ramteke R, Yadav R, Ramam M, Handa R, Kumar A. Prevalence and predictors of pulmonary artery hypertension in systemic sclerosis. J Assoc Physicians India. 2008;56:413-17. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/18822619/.
15.
Deswal A, Follansbee WP. Cardiac involvement in scleroderma. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1996;22(4):841-60. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Follansbee WP. The cardiovascular manifestations of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Curr Probl Cardiol. 1986;11(5):241-98. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Rezwanuzzaman SM, Al Miraj AK, Mony SK, Zaher MA, Ullah MA. Prevalence and clinical correlates of pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Sch Int J Tradit Complement Med. 2021;4(12):186-91.
18.
Elshereefa RR, Hassana AA, Darwisha AF, Asklanyb HT, Hamdy L. Pulmonary hypertension in scleroderma and its relation to disease activity. Egyptian Rheumatology & Rehabilitation. 2013;40:173-80. Available from: https://doi. org/10.4103/1110-161X.123789. [crossref]
19.
van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: An American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(11):2737-47. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Clements PJ, Lachenbruch PA, Seibold JR, Zee B, Steen VD, Brennan P, et al. Skin thickness score in systemic sclerosis: An assessment of interobserver variability in 3 independent studies. J Rheumatol. 1993;20(11):1892-96.
21.
Bergamasco A, Hartmann N, Wallace L, Verpillat P. Epidemiology of systemic sclerosis and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Clin Epidemiol. 2019;11:257-73. Doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S191418. eCollection 2019. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Shah Gupta R, Koteci A, Morgan A, George PM, Quint JK. Incidence and prevalence of interstitial lung diseases worldwide: A systematic literature review. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023;10(1):e001291. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Qiu M, Nian X, Pang L, Yu P, Zou S. Prevalence and risk factors of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease in East Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24(12):1449-59. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Rubio-Rivas M, Homs NA, Cuartero D, Corbella X. The prevalence and incidence rate of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2021;20(1):102713. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Coghlan JG, Wolf M, Distler O, Denton CP, Doelberg M, Harutyunova S, et al. Incidence of pulmonary hypertension and determining factors in patients with systemic sclerosis. Eur Respir J. 2018;51(4):1701197. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Morrisroe K, Stevens W, Sahhar J, Rabusa C, Nikpour M, Proudman S; Australian Scleroderma Interest Group (ASIG). Epidemiology and disease characteristics of systemic sclerosis-related pulmonary arterial hypertension: Results from a real-life screening programme. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):42. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Sharma VK, Trilokraj T, Khaitan BK, Krishna SM. Profile of systemic sclerosis in a tertiary care center in North India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2006;72(6):416-20. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Steen VD, Conte C, Owens GR, Medsger TA Jr. Severe restrictive lung disease in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37(9):1283-89.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/65990.18889

Date of Submission: Jun 12, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 02, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Oct 30, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 20, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 24, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com